Folk music in historical context
- Related Topics:
- Newport Folk Festival
- mariachi
- skiffle
- vallenato
- freak folk
- On the Web:
- Texas State Historical Association - Handbook of Texas - Folk Music (Nov. 21, 2024)
Since folk music lives in oral tradition, its history can best be understood through a study of its relationship to other musics. Many folk songs collected in oral tradition have been traced to literary sources, often of considerable antiquity. In medieval Europe, under the expansion of Christianity, attempts were made to suppress folk music because of its association with pre-Christian rites and customs; yet some aspects of European folk music became assimilated into medieval Christian liturgical music, and vice versa. Folk music has also been consciously incorporated into European art music compositions throughout history, especially during periods of renewal, beginning with the Renaissance.
During the late 15th and 16th centuries, the literate urban classes responded more favorably to folk music than their predecessors had in the medieval period. The humanistic attitudes of the Renaissance, which brought about the elevation of nature and of antiquity, encouraged the acceptance of folk music as a genre of rustic antique song. Some music in Renaissance manuscripts is presumed to be folk song by virtue of its musical simplicity and the rural and archaic evocations of its texts. Renaissance composers made extensive use of folk and popular music. Typical genres include polyphonic folk song settings and folk song quodlibets, or combinations of familiar songs. Folk tunes were often used as structural and motivic raw material for motets and masses; likewise, the music of the Protestant Reformation borrowed from folk music.
The use of folk music receded in the Baroque period (about 1600–1750), but the relationship of folk music to art music became a topic of interest in the late 18th century, when Western intellectuals began to glorify folk and peasant life. Folk music came to be venerated as a spontaneous creation of peoples unencumbered by artistic self-consciousness and aesthetic theories; it was considered to embody the common experience of inhabitants of the locale. These traits make folk music a fructifying source for art music, particularly when it is intended to evoke a particular nation or ethnic group. The nationalist movements of 19th- and early 20th-century art music drew on folk tunes and their styles, as well as folk dances and themes from folklore and village life, to develop distinctive repertories. Leaders in these movements included Bedrich Smetana and Dvořák for Czech music, Edvard Grieg for Norwegian, Mikhail Glinka and Modest Mussorgsky for Russian, Bartók for Hungarian, Georges Enesco for Romanian, and Aaron Copland and Roy Harris for American cultures.
Folk music is closely related to popular music in several ways. Societies that have developed popular music also have a folk music tradition, or remnants thereof. The partial duplication of repertories and style indicates such cross-fertilization that a given song may sometimes be called both folk and popular. With reference to music, folk and popular are two points on a musical continuum, rather than discrete bodies of music. Popular music, like folk music, has become a significant marker of ethnicity and nation, and folk music has become gradually more like popular music, produced by professionals and disseminated through mass media for consumption by an urban, nonparticipating mass audience.
Church music and folk music have been related at various times. Some church music derives from the application of religious texts to secular folk tunes. This practice may be seen, for example, in the hymns of the Protestant Reformation and in the revival hymns of 19th-century American camp meetings, which were called folk hymns because of their origins and associations with folklike groups.
A very significant way in which folk music is preserved is through its association with folk dance. Throughout European history, dancing by rural folk and village dances in urban and court society provided a major venue for folk music; although most of this music is instrumental, vocal folk dance music, sometimes sung by the dancers themselves, is common. In northern Europe even narrative ballads were used for dancing. There are many types of folk dance, some widespread throughout Europe, others peculiar to nations and regions, each with its typical musical style. Certain musical forms are characteristic of the folk dance music of various parts of Europe. Most prominent is a form type with paired lines, the second a variation of the first (e.g., AA′BB′ and so on). From the 1980s on, it would seem that practices of folk dancing in urban and student society have been responsible for the very preservation of folk music. Folk dance, with its accompanying music, is a staple of entertainment in the international tourist industry; the maintenance of folk dance has therefore become a matter of major concern to the ministries of culture in eastern Europe and in many of the world’s semi-industrialized and developing nations.
The study of folk music
The search for origins and processes of development that motivated much 19th- and early 20th-century intellectual activity was reflected in folk music scholarship. Some scholars believed folk music to be a repository of archaisms—a legacy from which the prehistory of music, language, literature, and other cultural traits could be adduced. Although later scholars concede that some traits of folk music may be centuries old, they are less inclined to speculate on the age of archaic elements of folk music or to offer historical reconstructions, other than tracing variants of individual songs or types of songs.
Musical notations of folk songs and descriptions of folk music culture are occasionally encountered in historical records, but these show not so much the history of folk music as the history of ideas held by the literate classes about folk music. National and social movements in the early 19th century stimulated the search for and collecting of folk songs. The variety of motivations is illustrated by Thomas Percy (who focused on the great age of certain ballads), Ludvik Rittersberk (who collected Czech folk songs as part of an effort by the Habsburg monarchy to unify the empire through recognizing the folklore of national minorities), and Ludolf Parisius (who collected German folk songs in order to preserve traditional village culture). In the second half of the 19th century, scholarship was motivated by the desire to find materials that could be used by composers of art music and by the ambition of producing comprehensive collections of the songs of a nation. This interest has continued into the 21st century, as attempts to circumscribe entire folk music repertoires in notation have been the intent of major projects, particularly in eastern Europe.
Since the last decade of the 19th century, folk music has been collected and preserved by mechanical recordings. The application of print and recording technology to folk music has promoted wide interest, making possible the revival of folk music where traditional folklife and folklore are moribund. Folk songs are frequently part of public school music curricula, and groups that focus in one way or another on folk music, often in conjunction with folk dance, have arisen; festivals of folk music and dance are an annual event in many communities throughout the world.
The literature on folk music consists primarily of songs and their texts—collections of individual countries or regions, even of individual singers. Some works have endeavored to integrate and compare the various styles of folk music in Western culture, and scholars have begun to produce theoretical works and studies of music in historical and contemporary cultural context. Many researchers have analyzed the use of folk music as material in art music. Major scholars in the history of folk music research include Bartók (who pioneered in making large collections of Hungarian, Romanian, and Slovak songs and in transcribing them accurately in musical notation), Cecil Sharp (who recognized the importance of collecting folk songs in diasporic cultures, e.g., Anglo-Americans), Walter Wiora (who showed that some tunes are found throughout Europe), and Samuel P. Bayard (who established the concept of tune family).
Scholars who specialize in folk music usually have training in ethnomusicology, a discipline concerned with elucidating music in a cross-cultural perspective and analyzing the role of music in society and culture. Studies of the words of folk songs are the province primarily of folklorists and students of language and literature. Musical studies concern folk genres and styles, as well as individual folk songs—how they originated, and whether, how, and why they changed when diffused. Theories of folk music have been beclouded by the difficulties in recognizing, isolating, and defining a phenomenon as elusive and complex as folk music. The forefront of folk music research in the 21st century entails the contemplation of 20th-century revivals of folk music; the application of concepts from postmodern cultural studies, gender studies, and critical theory; the use of folk music in political and national movements; the nature of folk music in the present; and its inseparability from other kinds of music.
After World War II, the availability of commercial recordings enabled scholars to work with greater sophistication, and archives of field recordings were developed at many institutions throughout the world. In the United States, those of the Library of Congress and Indiana University are the most important. National archives exist in most European countries—the most extensive being in Hungary, Slovakia, Germany, and the Scandinavian countries—providing ample research material for an enormous diversity of projects. Research has usually dealt with “authentic” (i.e., older) material not heavily influenced by urban popular music and the mass media. Several organizations for the study of folk music exist in individual nations; international organizations include the European Seminar in Ethnomusicology, the International Council for Traditional Music, and the Society for Ethnomusicology.
Bruno Nettl