Balfour Report

United Kingdom [1926]
verifiedCite
While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.
Select Citation Style
Feedback
Corrections? Updates? Omissions? Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login).
Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

Print
verifiedCite
While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.
Select Citation Style
Feedback
Corrections? Updates? Omissions? Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login).
Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

Balfour Report, report by the Committee on Inter-Imperial Relations at the 1926 Imperial Conference in London that clarified a new relationship between Great Britain and the Dominions of Canada, South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, and the Irish Free State. The Balfour Report declared that Britain and its Dominions were constitutionally equal to each other.

The question of who had ultimate constitutional authority had been raised in Canada in 1926 in the King-Byng Affair, in which Canadian Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King challenged the powers of Governor General Julian Byng in the context of a heated federal election campaign. It revolved around Byng’s refusal to honour King’s request that he dissolve Parliament and call for fresh elections. These events pointed to Britain’s retention of certain powers over Canada as well as over other semi-autonomous parts of the British Empire. The government in Ottawa, for example, did not fully control Canadian foreign policy. More importantly, only the British Parliament could change the British North America Act, the constitutional statute that underpinned Canada’s system of government.

The King-Byng debate was one of the factors leading to the Committee on Inter-Imperial Relations at the 1926 Imperial Conference in London. Under the leadership of Lord Arthur J. Balfour, a British cabinet minister and former prime minister, this committee examined and redefined the legal relationship among self-governing nations of the British Empire. King and South African Prime Minister J.B.M. Hertzog played a key role in developing the subsequent Balfour Report.

The report defines the group of self-governing communities composed of Great Britain and the Dominions as “autonomous Communities within the British Empire, equal in status, in no way subordinate one to another in any aspect of their domestic or external affairs, though united by a common allegiance to the Crown, and freely associated as members of the British Commonwealth of Nations.” The findings of the report were made law by the British Parliament in the 1931 Statute of Westminster, the founding document of the modern Commonwealth.

For Canada, this landmark document confirmed its status as a fully independent country. It remained linked to Britain politically and emotionally, but legal power had shifted decisively to the Canadian Parliament and its prime minister. It took several decades before Canada assumed all its powers under the Statute, but fairly quickly this shift led to an independent Canadian foreign policy and to the establishment of its diplomatic service. The final act of legal autonomy was the passing of the Constitution Act, 1982, marking the patriation of Canada’s Constitution from Britain.

An earlier version of this entry was published by The Canadian Encyclopedia .

Jon Tattrie