salutary neglect, Policy of the British government regarding its North American colonies under which trade regulations for the colonies were laxly enforced and imperial supervision of colonial affairs was loose as long as the colonies remained loyal to Britain and contributed to its economic profitability. The policy of salutary neglect contributed involuntarily to the increasing autonomy of colonial legal and legislative institutions, which ultimately led to U.S. independence. With the Navigation Acts of 1651 and the establishment of the Board of Trade (1696), Parliament had sought to maintain tight control over colonial trade, but under Robert Walpole, who became chief minister in 1721, British officials began turning a blind eye to colonial violations of trade regulations, seemingly because Walpole was content to ignore illegal trade if the ultimate result was greater profits for Britain. Some historians, however, argue that a greater cause of salutary neglect was instead the incompetence, weakness, and self-interest of poorly qualified colonial officials. During the period of salutary neglect, colonial legislatures exerted more control over the affairs of the colonies than did the (mostly crown-appointed) colonial governors, and they grew used to making their own decisions. Often linked to Parliament’s desire to recoup the costs of defending the colonies during the French and Indian War, the reversal of the policy of salutary neglect included imposition of the Sugar Act (1764) and Stamp Act (1765).
salutary neglect Article
salutary neglect summary
Learn about the British policy of salutary neglect of the North American colonies and how it contributed to U.S. independence
Below is the article summary. For the full article, see salutary neglect.