Daniel Dulany

American lawyer [1722-1797]
verifiedCite
While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.
Select Citation Style
Feedback
Corrections? Updates? Omissions? Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login).
Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

Print
verifiedCite
While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.
Select Citation Style
Feedback
Corrections? Updates? Omissions? Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login).
Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

Quick Facts
Born:
June 28, 1722, Annapolis, Maryland [U.S.]
Died:
March 17, 1797, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.
Political Affiliation:
loyalist

Daniel Dulany (born June 28, 1722, Annapolis, Maryland [U.S.]—died March 17, 1797, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.) was a lawyer who was an influential political figure in the period just before the American Revolution.

The son of the Maryland official of the same name, Daniel Dulany was educated in England and became a lawyer after returning to Maryland. He was a member of the Maryland legislative assembly from 1751 to 1754, and he was appointed to the Governor’s Council in 1757 in recognition of his support for the colony’s proprietary government. In the following years he held other high offices and also became known as one of the best lawyers in the American colonies. Though his sympathies were those of a loyal British subject, Dulany was critical of some policies of the British government, and, during the crisis over the Stamp Act of 1765, he wrote Considerations on the Propriety of Imposing Taxes in the British Colonies (1765), which was the most influential pamphlet that appeared in opposition to the Stamp Act. He opposed revolutionary action against British rule, however, and, during the American Revolution, he remained a loyalist, being deprived of his property in 1781 on account of this.

This article was most recently revised and updated by Encyclopaedia Britannica.